>>>>I don't hate the idea of Visual Freepro. One reason I choose not to use your product is that you
>>>>seem to have an irrational belief in some kind of Microsoft conspiracy. All along I've been telling
>>>>you what best practices are - "Not Microsoft's agenda". You seem to have stated that you believe
>>>>that not using PUBLIC is a dictate from Microsoft. You've even implied that some Fox people are
>>>>part of this conspiracy.
>>>>
>>>>FoxPro does have some really stupid stuff in it - that made sense at the time I'm sure - for one - storing
>>>>the path to a form - or to classes within the form. The pathing is important at design time. It is unimportant
>>>>or even incorrect at runtime - therefore the design environment has been forced into the runtime
>>>>environment - which is harmful and confusing. Storing multiple unrelated classes in a single classlib
>>>>and having no way to simply include a class in the exe unless it is in a classlib - unlike the .PRG
>>>
>>>
>>>I will not be responding to any of your future posts unless you ask me a direct question.
>>
>>Glad to know that. Who needs another programming language.
>
>Nah, he's just trying to create a new standard, and we all know that standards are a good thing -- everyone ought to have one. <g>
>
>Odd random thought... . If I stand to the right and think in Latin, does that make everyone else sinister?
No. But if you find any links left it will make you gauche.