>Whether he knew about this before it happened or not:
>
>a) he's widely known to be vindictive;
>b) hard to believe his staff would have done this without thinking he'd appreciate it;
>c) given his history as a US attorney (about which I've only heard positive things), you'd think that once questions were raised, he would have done a thorough investigation in-house.

Two points....first, I agree with everything you've said about him. Second, that very accurately describes our current president/administration as well. :)


I watched some of the MSNBC coverage yesterday and had to laugh at some of the commentary. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was very critical of the man who repeatedly took the fifth, and essentially said it was tantamount to an admission of something serious. But months ago when Lois Lerner plead the fifth, Schultz was intense in her defense of Lerner for invoking her constitutional right.

So while I haven't heard any commentary about Christie that I disagree with (aside from the ridiculous statement from a CNN person that there should be a murder charge), the double-standard is interesting.