>>Yes, it seems ethics, duty, and justice is entirely inconsequential to your lust for rich people's blood.
LOL. Imagine that I see a missing manhole on the street and point out that a bad accident is going to happen. According you, I'm lusting after blood? Nope. Somebody who wants the accident to happen would say nothing and stand by with iPhone ready to video the carnage.
For your benefit:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.If that's your recipe, we can agree to disagree.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
