Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Surrogate vs natural vs artificial, clustered vs non
Message
De
13/07/2014 12:45:29
 
 
À
12/07/2014 16:09:43
Information générale
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Catégorie:
Indexation
Versions des environnements
SQL Server:
SQL Server 2014
Application:
Web
Divers
Thread ID:
01603549
Message ID:
01603614
Vues:
49
>>
>>Hi Kevin,
>>
>>Our app is a high-insert app. Is the performance gain from Hekaton as significant if the current DB (2008R2) fits in memory and is backed by SSD?
>
>Possibly, but can't say with 100% certainty.
>
>There is a tool you can download - AMR, from Microsoft. It will analyze and monitor/profile your database to see if it's a candidate for Hekaton.
>
>http://sqlmag.com/sql-server-2014/sql-server-2014-analysis-migrate-report-tool-amr
>
>One thing - I believe Hekaton is only available in the Enterprise version of 2014.
>
>Also - there are several T-SQL functions that can't be used when inserting rows into Hekaton tables (a big one is date functions). So you'd have to abstract out your stored proc inserts to receiving nothing but scalar variables that are pre-populated with the values you want.


Thank you Kevin. We run Enterprise, so that is not an issue. I will pass-on the info about AMR.
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform