>You are accusing the Commonwealth Institute of "Junk Science" - the habit of forming a fixed position and then hunting for evidence that supports it.
>

Actually, no. I'd be paying Commonwealth a minor compliment if I accused them of "Junk Science". They're not even that clever. :)

If you have time, go read some of their literature. I spent some time last night reading some of their web content. They're approach is more shill-like and nearly cartoonish. I'd expect that from the DNC (and in fairness, RNC is just as bad)

"Junk science" is saying that GDP grew 5% in a quarter. Or that 2014 was the warmest year on record.