>>>That's the point. This guy isn't a hack who came out of nowhere with a WAG theory. He was a doctor at an university clinic, holds a patent to a surgical tool (IOW, already was rich enough), spends a number of years testing and re-testing his theory, has a success rate significantly above the statistics (IIRC, 6000 out of 6500 were cured), so the 1:99 ratio was, IMO, true in his case. And his results were repeated by others. And then his story turns into benighted instead of knighted.
>
>Sorry but when it comes to medical proof, what matters is validated, reproducible results. Not by "disciples" but by other experts in the field.

His own university refused to discuss the matter. He went through proper channels.

>According to the literature, in fact there isn't a single case of "cure" attributed to his beliefs. 6000 out of 6500 cured? That's so compelling that if only it were true, the FDA and everybody else would bend over backwards to fast track one of the most amazing medical inventions since penicillin.

Considering the amount of money that the industry makes, I have my doubts on this readiness. An acquaintance of mine was spending 10000€ a month on the state-of-the-art treatment, and yet she died within a couple of months.

As for the Jewish connection, I don't care, that's politics.