>>His own university refused to discuss the matter. He went through proper channels.

Dragan, this doesn't make sense. Universities all over the world are competing to come up with something meaningful that can be monetized and will create careers for all. IME any sort of medical discovery attracts funding, draws in students and traveling Professors and earns considerable prestige. Universities do *not* conspire to shut down valuable discoveries- they are eager to be part of any sort of research that carries the science forward, especially if it involves breakthrough success rates. Worth noting that a properly conducted but unsuccessful attempt still is creditable as it adds to the body of available knowledge.

>>Considering the amount of money that the industry makes, I have my doubts on this readiness. An acquaintance of mine was spending 10000€ a month on the state-of-the-art treatment, and yet she died within a couple of months.

Sorry to hear it. On the other hand, the famous little girl who almost died under Dr Hamer's care, eventually was wrestled from him by the State by which time her Wilm's tumor had grown to 4kg and was stopping her breathing and her odds of cure has fallen from 90% to 10%- yet she was cured by conventional therapy. I do not know your acquaintance's chances when she commenced treatment, but early detection (via screening, a diligent GP, an observant patient or even good luck) can make a huge difference to success rates whereas late detection can leave you with dismal prospects, no matter how state-of-the-art the treatment options may be.