>>
>>I agree about the evolution question. That's a good indicator.
>
>Not necessarily. A person can hold one set of beliefs without them affecting their views on public policy. I am not going to drop the context of Democrats who personally oppose abortion and even work with charities that work against abortion (like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden) - and yet support Roe v Wade.
>
>Using what you described as an indicator in itself is VERY questionable and opens up many cans of works (with both parties).
>
>Once again, it is the wrong question.

Why is a person's view on evolution not a good indicator?
If someone said that the world is flat, would you not question that person's judgment?

Regarding Joe and Nancy.
I'm in their camp. For a lot of personal reasons, I think that adoption is a much better choice than abortion and my family and I support several charities that promote adoption.
Joe and Nancy have similar beliefs for their own personal reasons.

That said, I won't presume to impose my ideas on people having to make that choice, nor do Joe and Nancy.
That's an agonizing choice and politicians who demonize those people are practicing the worst kind of demagoguery.