>>>>The camels back is not broken at this point and IMO some gov stimuli moved things in a positive direction. but it certainly is not without fault.
>>>
>>>If you find ANYTHING conceived by people that is without fault, let me know.
>>>Government intervention invariably has its negatives, but I thought that this was an enlightened approach for that area.
>>>It seems to be working well and more turbines are coming on stream (excuse the pun.)
>>
>>
>>If you thought the ACA negatively impacted the U.S. economy, you ain't seen nothing yet (if the administration has its way with these green initiatives). German lower middle class and middle class citizens have many stories to tell about impacts of power grid irregularities and increased bills. Even the German govt acknowledged that its initiatives back in 2013 were poorly conceived - and apparently Mr. Obama is a very bad student of history.
>
>The notion that higher energy cost is bad and vice versa is dubious and often downright wrong.
>Stability of supply and price is an important, if not the most important factor.

Oh, now you want to talk stability? Take a look at power irregularities when the government tries to force higher %s of green energy production.

I'm not saying renewable energy is bad. I'm saying that efforts to artificially increase renewal production % in order to attain a political goal is a mistake.