>>JR, this is my last line of this (well, at least for today) :)
>>That is revisionist history.
No, it's simple logic. Of course Obama was talking about the ACA's effect on plans you already had and liked when it came into effect. Post-ACA it's absurd and desperate to expect you could take on a new plan that didn't meet the standard... and then keep it forever. But that's what your version insists on- that Obama emasculated his own Act so you can call him a liar. Talk about revisionism.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
