Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Plugins in messages
Message
From
21/03/2016 20:17:24
 
 
To
21/03/2016 19:42:16
Lutz Scheffler
Lutz Scheffler Software Ingenieurbüro
Dresden, Germany
General information
Forum:
Level Extreme
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01633447
Message ID:
01633459
Views:
48
>#1 I, as a paying customer, say what I like or dislike about any business I deal with. Straight forward and to the owner. The other way is to stop using and paying (to a business). Like it or not, or say if you dislike my money. Subscription ends those day, not much harm done.
>#2 Diskusion is into open as it was all those years, to let other add there opinion about it to make your desicion based on a broader spectrum. If, you dislike it, say so. I can see what others think about it and adjust my POV or act acordingly. If the discussion is on PM it's not the same.
>
>I see, as I have expressed before, the way UT heads those day very critical.
>
>The site I linked you has a url in it that you need to copy and paste to reach. If you act otherwise in germany you could be sued. If I, as german set a link on your site I could be sued. Google is outside of german jurisdication, I'm not. Again, this is minor, UT is not TP.
>
>Active adds= thumbnail pictures for the moment. I must have avoided youtube stuff for all those years. I've first run into it the last week.
>I (Me personal) feel, that I should have control how my message should deal with such stuff. I would not include it and I would like to ban it from messages I read.
>
>As lesser a site is using so called active stuff like java script and as lesser pictures an embedded stuff like youtube or banner advertisement is used, the better a side is. It's lesser security thread to the customer and more professionalism on the owners side. I'm 100% shure you will not pay may losses to if your side gets hacked and spreads out maleware. Java script - for example - is pretty well used to spread out Ransomeware. It's a security problem from the start. And, just to use you own example, google.com works pretty well without.
>So I minimize my risk as good as I can.

We always encourage users to submi their feedback. However, those submitted in a productive way are usually more pleasant to read.

The Google page, for the search engine, does not require javascript, probably, because it is very straight forward. When you access a full blown application Web site, there has to be something more than just HTML to make it run.

So, basically, if I understand correctly, when you put a URL in a message, you do not want the site to hyperlink the URL, correct?

And, secondly, when there is a YouTube reference in a message, you would like to have the ability to switch that off in your account settings, correct?
Michel Fournier
Level Extreme Inc.
Designer, architect, owner of the Level Extreme Platform
Subscribe to the site at https://www.levelextreme.com/Home/DataEntry?Activator=55&NoStore=303
Subscription benefits https://www.levelextreme.com/Home/ViewPage?Activator=7&ID=52
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform