>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix7lQLplA_E&feature=youtu.be
>>
>>Garland's past record on 2nd amendment rights are troubling - and even more troubling is his record of backing the EPA. EPA has done the unthinkable - they've passed the IRS in terms of corruption.
>>
>>(Somewhat humorous that the political left is all up in arms about Garland's position on Gitmo detainees...probably the only thing I agree with Garland on)
>>
>>But even beyond that - Obama before picked both Kagan and Sotomayor over Garland.
>>
>>Now, Sotomayor is a highly intelligent and capable judge. I don't agree with some of her decisions, but she's proven herself more than worthy.
>>
>>However, Kagan has demonstrated the last few years that she's nearly incompetent. Her statements during oral arguments the last few years clearly show that she doesn't know the difference between a legal statute and a government regulation/mandate/order. She's an embarrassment to the court. And yet Obama picked Kagan over Garland?
>>
>>It is clear that Obama's pick was a throw-away pick - the Senate should just vote Garland down and let's start this over in January.
>
>As Mitch points out, those points, right or wrong, aren't as important as what the NRA says.
>
>It's pretty clear that one of the pre-conditions for leadership in the Republican party is an IQ below that of the average high school dropout.

You shouldn't insult high school dropouts like that.

>Mitch meets the standard with ease and has room to spare.
>This man sets a new low for political savvy.
>These people are practically sending Hillary an engraved invitation to the White House.

ix7lQLplA_E