>Also there are separate reports of sexual abuse victims begging that access to female toilets not be set by gender identity but by biological sex, the position being that abusers could (and already are) declaring false gender identity to gain access to potential victims. Which also seems like common sense. The realistic scenario of an abuser claiming female identity to lurk in a female toilet used by little girls who ought to be safe in their own facilities, is chilling.

I'm aware that this is the rationale cited by those creating these laws. I haven't seen any reports of actual cases of an abuser doing this. Have you?

Tamar