Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Here's what All Inclusive really means
Message
De
06/05/2016 09:53:25
 
 
À
06/05/2016 09:35:08
Information générale
Forum:
Family
Catégorie:
Événements
Divers
Thread ID:
01635834
Message ID:
01635931
Vues:
53
>
>That said, I'm certainly in favor of most kids having contact with both parents. But that's not the reality for plenty of kids and hasn't been for nearly half a century. I am opposed to systems that increase the disadvantage of those already disadvantaged.
>

Banning "father-daughter" dances is certainly not "increasing the disadvantage of those already disadvantaged"

You mentioned in a prior post that you found the concept of "father-daughter" dances to be offensive. OK, I don't agree, but that's fine, we can disagree.

But where I have a problem is when people take that concept of "oh, I'm so offended" and turn it into a (silly) social justice action.

And on the topic of "being offended, therefore it's OK to take action", here's another little gem. The actual specifics of this case (and the sequence of events) are somewhat in question, but if the general story here is correct, here's another example of going too far.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/5338/catholic-college-employee-investigated-police-amanda-prestigiacomo
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform