>
>In 2008, Hillary Clinton was rightly slammed for her campaign being poorly run. By contrast, Obama's was "no drama." This year, Hillary's campaign is running smoothly with few hiccups, but Trump's is a mess. If the campaign is about evaluating leadership potential, the contrast is pretty clear.
>

Seriously?

It's easy to have a fielding percentage of 1.000 - if you never walk on the field.

She has either done the fewest (or closed to the fewest) # of press conferences/open press events of any candidate in a long time.

She has an unfavorable rating over 50%. In most polls, people believe Comey and the FBI went light on her.

Nearly every significant statement she has made regarding her email servers and classified/top secret information has been vitiated, either by the FBI or by subsequent information from FOIA requests.

The only reason someone might say her campaign has been "OK" is because Trump's has been a train wreck. But by any reasonable standard, Clinton has not run a strong campaign. That's why her final lead over Sanders wasn't entirely impressive, even given how much the DNC pushed for her and given that Sanders is an avowed socialist.