>
>No, I'm not. But if part of your self-described qualification for the office is your leadership experience and quality, then the inability to run a good campaign is a campaign issue.
>

Until people vote, a "good compaign" exists in the eye of the pundit.
We'll find out on election day who did run a good campaign.
As Nate now sees it, Hillary is doing a lot better and that's a pretty powerful indicator.
However, at about this point in 1976, Gerald Ford had a large lead over Jimmy Carter.
When in a debate Ford said that the Soviet Union had no influence over Eastern Europe, things flipped and Ford never recovered.
People liked Gerald Ford.
Imagine what would happen if she gaffed.