>>>To strongly appear quite guilty and never be exonerated, yes, that is where we are.
>>>Just as innocent as OJ
>
>OJ's dead wife meant that "somebody" is a murderer. There was a definite crime and prosecutors felt evidence pointed to OJ beyond reasonable doubt.
>
>In this case there's no dead body or any visible victim at all, meaning there's no certainty that *any* crime was committed let alone by HRC.
>Where are the victims who experienced the unlikely losses so HRC could make extraordinary gains?

There is no victim - nobody ever said there was a victim.
Nobody ever said or implied the money was stolen.
Let's not change the subject or we are going to be debating the meaning of "is" before long.

>Certainly gamblers are sensitive to marked cards so any conspiracy ought to be unraveling by now.
Again, changing the subject.
Nobody was cheated, there is nobody to cry foul.

Somebody paid her $100k and wanted to hide the trail from his pocket to hers.
Money laundering hides the source and converts it to "clean" taxable money.

Her broker was a KNOWN MONEY LAUNDERER.

>>no certainty that *any* crime was committed let alone by HRC
She collected a large sum of money from a KNOWN MONEY LAUNDERER.
This is commonly known as a "bribe."

If somebody wins big at the roulette table in a crooked casino, it ain't luck.