>Please review what was said in real life- which is that she was obstructed and white-anted. You may think that's OK because you don't approve of her, but that sort of ad feminem politics has gotten the US into a big mess.

Nancy Pelosi, a real legislator who wasn't appointed by her husband, gave us a lesson in leadership when she rammed the ACA through without a single republican vote. At first, she was lacking enough dem votes but she bargained - that's what legislators do- and she passed it.
As I've said here, I think the passage of ACA was a mistake, but what Nancy did was a lesson for all legislators.

So, please spare me the sexist/right-wing conspiracy propaganda. HRC is neither fit nor trustworthy to carry Nancy's briefcase.

>> In particular, consider Medicare which is socialized healthcare enjoyed if you manage to last to the age of 65. If if's good enough to qualify for socialized care just because you reach the age of 65, why not extend that to others- especially the "others" who will be paying for it. But if it's HRC trying to push that- then block her, because she's naughty

I agree with that and it's inevitable that it will happen. However, please show me where she proposed that.

She did however oppose eliminating the cap on FICA and Medicare contributions- which will make both sound into the next decade- till Bernie forced her into it.