>>No one except Comey can shed any further light on it.
>>
>
>Well, I think it's fair to say that HRC could shed light on it.
>
Yes. And she could have shed light on Whitewater, Travelgate, Monica et al, the pardons, Libya, ad nauseum and never did.
Their strategy has been to denigrate the accuser (in many cases that has not been difficult.. they have been blessed with having some of the most incompetent opponents in history) and it has largely worked.

>


>However, there is one fact that many of HRC's supporters are evading - this all happened because of HRC in the first place. The quote from Colin Powell says it all - "everything HRC touches, she kind of screws up with hubris"
>
>I have a theory - and it's purely my opinion and purely speculation - that in the next five days you're going to see something major from WikiLeaks regarding HRC - one that will explain why Comey did what he did.

Yes.
Unless Comey is a complete dimwit (not out of the question) there has to be something important here.
In a way, though, it's better if he waits till after the election.
We can impeach her- be rid of the Clinton cancer forever- and avoid a Trump fiasco.
Lots of birds with one stone.

The real question, however, is...
How do we avoid getting into another mess identical to this one?
I've been watching US politics longer than most here, and I've never seen us reach these depths.
This is serious.
A lot more than some emails are at stake here.