>I don't know yet. Obviously, it would be terrible for those workers, but depending what the company's getting for keeping them here, it might be better for the US as a whole. Plus we don't know yet what the workers will have to give back to the company (salaries, benefits, working conditions) to keep those jobs.
>
>The usual liberal drivel - the rights of the many outweigh the rights of the few. If individuals have no rights, neither does the collective.
>
>In the meantime, the November jobs report shows 178,000 new jobs and unemployment down to 4.6%.
>
>ROFL and LOL!!!! And what was the labor force participation rate? I am pretty sure that if you go off of unemployment benefits and on to welfare, according to the statistics, you are no longer unemployed. I am surprised that even you can't see how absurd this is.

Make sure you get your facts straight.

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
http://www.bls.gov/cps/lfcharacteristics.htm#emp
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm#unemployed


>Yeah, this move shows other companies how to get tax breaks and other goodies from the government. Do you doubt that there are CEOs right now planning to threaten to move their companies in order to see what they get from the government?
>
>I don't know.

Exactly.


>But it certainly can't be worse than Obama wasting almost a trillion dollars on shovel ready projects that - uh- weren't really quite shovel ready. I guess that we will have to just wait and see. That is, everyone except for you will have to wait and see. Apparently, your mind is already made up.

Often those who choose to refuse reality (aka denial) will tell the other person that their mind is already made up.