>> Do you doubt that there are CEOs right now planning to threaten to move their companies in order to see what they get from the government?
>>
>
>Carrier didn't invent the threat to move in order to squeeze enticements out of governments.
>
>
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/04/nj_small_businesses_take_aim_at_tax_subsidies_for.html>
>Corporations in NJ, CT, NY and PA play that game regularly and politicians in both parties go along with it.
>
>I think it's absurd. If a company in NJ threatens to move to PA or vice versa, let it go. People can easily follow that work if they choose and the standard of living is roughly equal.
>
>Not so with Mexico.
>First, it's too far. Second, people making $30/hr can't live on $30/day.
>
>As I said, we don't know all the facts here and probably never will.
>Carrier is owned by United Technologies, which does billions of dollars in government contracting.
>That opens a lot of avenues for dealing or arm twisting and Trump is expert at both.
And now it turns out that Trump has a financial interest in Carrier's parent company:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-had-investments-in-carrier-corp-s-parent-1480723443Tamar
