>>>The point is did he do it because he was criticised and I wouldn't count it out.
>
>In that case isn't it Newsspeak to describe the situation as "Trump choosing to pick on a particular business" as if he spontaneously launched an attack. It's not as if he's one of those baiters going into a religious bakery or pizzeria to try to cause a furor, he's counter-punching.
>
>>>He shots from the hip and if something annoys him he responds.
>
>Awful. What sort of human being would do that? ;-) Seriously- some people would regard it as "honesty" or even a "real person" rather than a faked-up trumped-up politician spouting sanitized soundbites.
>
>>> You can't have it both ways . Either its a completely new game or not.
>
>Calling a spade a spade: if a CEO or business attacks Trump, they should expect a response in kind. Can't handle a response in kind? Then don't start something you can't finish. Seems to me that this makes everything very straight forward.

At least he won't have to worry abut open mic gaffes. Every thought that bounces round inside his head gets tweeted right out.