>>What? I have to tell you I have doubts about the honesty of this conversation... You claimed in a previous post that FBI made these statements and I asked you to provide a source. You didn't. There is none at this point. Only an investigation to see whether hacking, probing, targeting was overwhelmingly done in the direction of the DNC/HRC. At this point, the premise of that investigation has more merit than what I get from your argumentation here.
I have no obligation to do basic research for you and it's not an interesting discussion if you show little sign of researching your own declarations while demanding proof of the basics.
I found this instantly by googling "fbi in agreement cia" :
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-blames-putins-personal-grudge-against-her-for-election-interference/2016/12/16/12f36250-c3be-11e6-8422-eac61c0ef74d_story.htmlWhile we're at it, your own prior citation answers most of your own questions if you read it in full.
I agree there's little value in this sort of "argumentation." Argument is about determining who is right; discussion is about determining what is right. I'm only interested in discussion, so lets leave it there.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
