>I was speaking only about 2016. Yes, I considered them all dangerous to things I believe in, but as I said, only the two dangerous to democracy.
>
>Interesting that you thought that Abraham Lincoln was dangerous. What did you have against freeing the slaves?

I didn't say that. A few messages back, you asked if I considered all 17 2016 Republican candidates dangerous to democracy. I answered that question. When you didn't get the answer you expected (or wanted), you then raised the issue of all Republicans ever.

That's what you do every time you don't like my answer or it shows you to be wrong. You deflect, you add something that wasn't in the original discussion.

Tamar