General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Hi Dimitry,
I remember asking myself whether I should:
1) let the list of parameters of a central routine of a complex to grow massively,
2) re-organised the code with some sort of "state-object" (yep just a plain old custom object).
I was in a hurry and decided to stick to solution 1). I can certainly say that I was wrong. Passing a pretty large number of parameters ? Possibly that's the the time to incorporate at least ONE "state-object" resource to be passed as a single parameter possibly along with other parameters that may be kept as standalone atomic parameters. It both improves the reading and reduce the clutter.
all this IMVHO of course, Daniel
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only