>Lovely not need an income because you've managed to extract such vast amounts from the economy at a time when the middle classes and working classes are getting poorer than ever. But you know where all the poor peoples money went. Donald and Betsy hoovered it up, and now by some miracle you think they claim the moral high ground by not needing to be paid. > >Welcome to the new American aristocracy. So rich they don't need an income. But plenty of time and influence to devise systems that ensure they and their heirs become even richer. > >I would say that Obama is rich enough that he doesn't need an income, but he took it anyway. He also took as many tax paid perk as he could during he reign: > >http://ijr.com/2014/05/138996-obama-1er-438-increase-wealth-since-taking-office/ > >You really do sound bitter and envious when you talk about successful people who have manged to accumulate some wealth. It is really unattractive.
BTW here's an interesting piece about devos and education
