>>However, Kevin's post was about the "uproar" created today vs no uproar in Obama's time. So, until we come up with an exact definition of "uproar", I am going to consider it reporting on facts. Otherwise, there may be hypocrisy in claiming hypocrisy.
Cherry-picking sophistry.
Kevin's point to which you responded:
The point is the sanctimonious hypocrisy of much of the media. - they will go out of their way to generate opposition to Trump but they were more accepting of the Obama administration.Your explanation was the "rhetoric" that Obama did not use. Meaning that Trump did. Stop ducking and jiving.
Happy to discuss in a normal context-sensitive fashion, but not to attend a latter-day Hatter's Tea Party. ;-)
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
