>>>However, Kevin's post was about the "uproar" created today vs no uproar in Obama's time. So, until we come up with an exact definition of "uproar", I am going to consider it reporting on facts. Otherwise, there may be hypocrisy in claiming hypocrisy.
>
>Cherry-picking sophistry.
>
>Kevin's point to which you responded:
>
>The point is the sanctimonious hypocrisy of much of the media. - they will go out of their way to generate opposition to Trump but they were more accepting of the Obama administration.
>
>Your explanation was the "rhetoric" that Obama did not use. Meaning that Trump did. Stop ducking and jiving.
>
>Happy to discuss in a normal context-sensitive fashion, but not to attend a latter-day Hatter's Tea Party. ;-)

John, I appreciate your riddles, but at this point I think you must be reading the wrong post. My response to Kevin's was only in regard to his comment about the treatment of James Rosen, and the response in the media to that. (Message #1648364)
I don't know what you're implying. Please post links or citations.
*