Hi Cetin
Thanks for your contribution. I alway appreciate your views on the UT:)
> I would try keeping away from COM unless absolutely needed.
It is absolutely needed here. Of course, you might believe VFP is not suited for such tasks. I share you views that it's better to keep VFP at what is good at!
Well I had to do that. And the Fox did cope pretty decently with this messy requirements. A miracle, at times...
Yep, You wonder indeed how VFP, whose architecture is certainly not recent, could handle this complex com-based structures properly. It does except for the thing I mentioned, garbage not "collected" from dropped collections. I reckon storing these objects in collections is a no-go. Build them and have them stored in arrays and, should you need collections, use them as an integer pointer into your good old arrays...
That's my experience here. As I said, this is a bit specific to VFP. I remember building such complex collection-based code in python with zero problems. But yep, in python, build a UI experience is still much, much, much harder work than VFP!
Daniel
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only