>>>>>>>...meanwhile Trump says "I have the best intel - look at this..." - then simply hands it to the Russian spies he invited into the oval office. which is worse...duh
>>>>>
>>>>>... according to a "source" who wasn't at the meeting. The narrative of a blundering Trump blurting out state secrets is denied by all the US officials at the meeting and (remarkably) even by the the Russians who say they can prove it!
>>>>>
>>>>>But still the fake news rolls on, disconnected from evidence or sensibility.
>>>>
>>>>Oops I forgot you're brainwashed and still believe a pathological liar (and now Putin too apparently) :)
>>>
>>>Victor, I'm curious, if Bill and JR are brainwashed, what am I?
>>
>>Ok as a side note here - I'm not the one that came up with the term 'brainwashed' here in this tread.
>>
>>But - to answer your question - let me ask you something first. Who do you believe is a more reliable source of information here? A pathological liar or a (or several) respected journalist from a respect newspaper with a long history for accurately reporting the stories they cover? And do you think there is a problem with Trump's administration links to Russia? ..or do you think it's all 'fake news'?
>
>Are you referring to the NYT?

I wasn't thinking of a specific news outlet so much... - just in general if you think all of these Trump teams' ties to Russian interests or for that matter Trump's ties to Russia is actually a real thing or it's fake news? And if it's real - do you see it as a problem or not?