>>Trump Jr got an email saying the Kremlin had dirt on HRC then met with a Russian lawyer for the Kremlin to try to get the dirt - not to mention the fact that he repeatedly lied about it and changed his story around 1/2 dozen times. If you don't see a problem wit that then you don't grasp the concepts of America law.
Catastrophist language proves nothing. "Lawyer for the Kremlin?" Sounds dire... but in real life it's a string of loose hearsay you'd discount immediately if applied against one of your saints. But against a Trump it's more than enough to justify thunderous denunciations.
And again you imply that anybody who disagrees with your bias is in some way deficient. In this case, you strain at Trump JR gnats while swallowing HRC camels... while acting as if this overt bias is the only interpretation that makes sense.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
