>>>Trump Jr got an email saying the Kremlin had dirt on HRC then met with a Russian lawyer for the Kremlin to try to get the dirt - not to mention the fact that he repeatedly lied about it and changed his story around 1/2 dozen times. If you don't see a problem wit that then you don't grasp the concepts of America law.
>
>Catastrophist language proves nothing. "Lawyer for the Kremlin?" Sounds dire... but in real life it's a string of loose hearsay you'd discount immediately if applied against one of your saints. But against a Trump it's more than enough to justify thunderous denunciations.
>
>And again you imply that anybody who disagrees with your bias is in some way deficient. In this case, you strain at Trump JR gnats while swallowing HRC camels... while acting as if this overt bias is the only interpretation that makes sense.

if you think Trump Jr. did nothing wrong then just say that this is what you think - otherwise you have nothing here. And if that is what you think - then you are simply wrong.