Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Trump - schmump - Listen to this idot
Message
From
01/12/2017 14:45:58
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
News
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01655930
Message ID:
01656008
Views:
42
>>>
>>>Putting someone in the lost cause voter category - well, about all I can say is that pretty much sums up the HRC attitude, and is part of the reason why HRC lost. Enough people were tired of her attitude.
>>
>>As I said, I've pulled the R lever twice during my life.
>>
>>The first time I pulled it for Ike when he ran against Stevenson the second the time.
>>I was in college then and the reaction from my D friends on the campus - who had convinced themselves that Adlai, the darling of the intellectual left, couldn't lose - was even more heated than Victor's response here.
>>
>>I'm certainly not comparing Trump to Ike - they're not even from the same planet - but on the other hand when I compare HRC to someone as classy as Adlai Stevenson- who against anyone but Ike would have had my enthusiastic support- I'm reminded again of how far both parties have veered off course.
>>
>>Responses like Victor's are common. My dear friend Mike still can't accept the fact that people could be so stupid as to elect Obama twice.
>>It took me almost a year to accept the fact that Bush had been re-elected.
>>If Victor is as smart as I think he is, he'll eventually start looking at why so many people disagreed with him.
>>
>>That works.
>>Back in 1960, after losing badly twice to Ike, the party got its act together and nominated JFK.
>>Now - well, let's just say that was a great moment for me and my fellow D's.
>
>I was too young to vote in Florida in 1960 ( but not in Georgia) but I was a mild Nixon supporter mainly because of Ike. Ike was CIC when I was sworn into the Army and Clinton was CIC when I did my last active duty. My roommate in 1960 was a 100% JFK supporter and might have convinced me to vote for JFK if I had been old enough. I believe JFK would have been one of the great presidents if he had lived - he had a vision for the future of this country. To me he would have been a right of center republican in today's environment. On the 1960 election, JFK won by about 100 K votes out of 68 million but I'm sure you can remember the fraud charges even J. E. Hoover referring the FBI case to the AG - Robert Kennedy where it died. What most people don't remember is that the courts stopped many the recounts just like they did with Gore/Bush. The only state to have it's original electoral college vote count changed was HI from JFK to Nixon.
>The biggest problem with JFK and Nixon relate to the same principle - abandonment of promises made to friends - JFK to Cubans in the Bay of Pigs and Nixon to Vietnamese if DRV invaded RVN.
>Since we are probably the 2 oldest people on this site I would be interested in how and why you would rate the presidents in your lifetime.

Hmmm
Good question.
Have to rate FDR, Ike, Truman and Reagan as 1,2,3,4
FDR needs no explanation.
Ike because of how he ended the war in Korea and built the interstates,
Truman because of the Marshall plan and his handling of postwar Japan. (selfishly, I also liked the GI bill he gave us.)
Reagan because of how he ended the cold war. His domestic policies were awful, but his work with Gorbachev was historic.
Emotionally, I want to put JFK on the list because of how he inspired my generation, but intellectually, I have to keep him off because he never had a chance to accomplish much,

The rest are a mish mash
The worst - that's easy.
GW Bush and Clinton.
Anyone who does not go overboard- deserves to.
Malcolm Forbes, Sr.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform