Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Judge Moore
Message
 
To
11/12/2017 20:24:36
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., New Zealand
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Elections
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01656222
Message ID:
01656308
Views:
41
>>>Check the facts and read all of what he's said not just part of what he said.
>
>Well, here's something that appalled a lot of the Alabama voters I know personally: it's MSNBC’s Chuck Todd interviewing Jones in September. I see no mention of your "to save a mother's life," he's talking about a woman's "my body, my life" right to choose- which is the point I made.
>
>TODD: But you wouldn’t legislate — so, you wouldn’t be in favor of legislation that said, ban abortion after 20 weeks or something like that?
>
>JONES: I’m not in favor of anything that is going to infringe on a woman’s right and her freedom to choose. That’s just the position that I’ve had for many years. It’s a position I continue to have.
>
>But when those people — I want to make sure that people understand that once a baby is born, I’m going to be there for that child. That’s where I become a right to lifer.

>
>Your turn: where did he say late abortion is acceptable only to save the woman's life? Because it sure looks like he's saying it should be on demand up to the moment of birth.

Right - so you read one tiny piece from one interview and didn't bother to read up on anything else where he actually went into details on the subject.

Now read up on where he went into more detail
http://www.al.com/news/huntsville/index.ssf/2017/11/doug_jones_speaks_on_abortion.html

...and might read up on this too, which explains what Kayla Moore is saying on the subject while campaigning for her husband is B.S.
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/fact_check_doug_jones_does_not.html

....and I'm not doing research for you anymore either - you can figure this stuff out on your own instead of string up unnecessary arguments - I'm going to chill and let you think whatever you want and I will not bother to explain things or argue about it.

>>>Yeah and Japan didn't ban child pornography until 2014 - doesn't mean it was ok and right before that, and its not right for a D.A. in their 30's to be dating girls under 17 years old either - and I don't think it was ok in the late 1970's anymore than it is today.
>
>Yeah and having sex with 14-year-olds was legal in Hawaii until 2001. Was it OK before then? Clearly Hawaiian society thought so, because they controlled their own state laws that are supposed to lay down society's framework and social compact.
>
>Should a DA in his 30s have been dating teens in the 1970s in Alabama? I don't think so, but I wasn't in Alabama in the 1970s. Depending who you ask who was, it might have been not just acceptable, but with enthusiastic parental approval. In fact, 2 of your 16-year-old "victims" describe dating Moore with their mother's blessing, if you follow your own advice to see all of what they said.

I'm no longer explaining to you that Moore is a sexual predator who has a history of preying upon underage girls and that its wrong, and wrong for him to be in office. You disagree with this assessment and that is that.
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform