>>So now you do know know the definition of the word "false" either ?
By this logic, the meaning of "heart attack" can be determined by looking up the word "heart". Or "attack."
No. Of course a neologism, as much as or more so than other conceptual units (phrases), can have a meaning distinct from its singleton components.
>>At this point it's obvious that you're just unwilling to admit I'm right for the sake of having an argument about something you know you're wrong about. It's a shame you can not make such an admission.
What are you saying I'm wrong about now- anaphora, conceptual units in English, or the 6 other types of fake news that you insist on ignoring even though their description immediately follows the citation you are belaboring/misstating?
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
