>>>So now you do know know the definition of the word "false" either ?
>
>By this logic, the meaning of "heart attack" can be determined by looking up the word "heart". Or "attack."
>
>No. Of course a neologism, as much as or more so than other conceptual units (phrases), can have a meaning distinct from its singleton components.
>
>>>At this point it's obvious that you're just unwilling to admit I'm right for the sake of having an argument about something you know you're wrong about. It's a shame you can not make such an admission.
>
>What are you saying I'm wrong about now- anaphora, conceptual units in English, or the 6 other types of fake news that you insist on ignoring even though their description immediately follows the citation you are belaboring/misstating?

When a news reporter accurately reports a news story it's not fake. I don't know how much simpler I can make this to you. If ya don't follow then so be it - but you're falling for Trump's b.s. and as I pointed out this whole fake news b.s. is a danger to our democracy. You don't live here so I doubt you care anyway...so once again...move along.