>>>I see the problems with the polls in the last election. One thing to remember is that they're just what they say they are -- polls. A lot of people who were going to vote for Trump probably were unwilling to admit it because they knew he was a racist dirtbag and didn't want to own up to the fact they were voting for such a person - thus skewing the poll numbers. Polls will never be 100% correct for many reasons - they only sample a small part of the population. And of course there was a consensus that the American voters would not be dumb enough to vote for Trump - obviously they were wrong about that.
>
>Nice, but still not making sense. If people knew he was a racist dirtbag you'd be ashamed to vote for- why did they vote for him again?

Because they were either stupid or more misogynistic than they were racist I guess.

>And if he was such an unlikely candidate, why did HRC and DNC collude with those Russians via flimsy cutouts to create a hit dossier on Trump that was then used by politicized DOJ/FBI to spy on his team?

I see you do not know what you are talking about here -- so I will leave that one alone lol lol.

>Why did a CNN stooge undermine democracy by leaking presidential debate questions to the HRC camp?

What Donna Brazile did was not on behalf of CNN - you'd have to ask her why she did it.

>This dossier that's about to be released when Trump allows his 5-day right of reply period to expire without comment- if it shows more dirt, why was your side motivated to behave like that, even accusing Trump of your own crimes?

I see again you do not know what you are talking about here -- so I will leave that one alone lol lol.