>Just to put some of the derangement syndrome into context: whatever defects you may ascribe to Trump, imagine if he had... maybe not a fawning press behind him like certain other presidents, but maybe a press that could publish (say) 20% of the good news rather than the measured >90% attacks that are now causing cringing around the world, it's so biased and transparent. Imagine he wasn't distracted by never-ending investigations built on sleazy hateful dossiers funded by certain charming political opponents. Where might the US be today if he didn't have all that to contend with?

The fawning press is a handy target, but it was squarely against Trump before he was elected and he won.

Obama and Trump were both elected because a lot of people in this country are very unhappy.

Obama promised change and didn't deliver, hence Trump.

Those people are still very unhappy.

It's probable that Trump won't deliver either and then we'd better batten down the hatches.