>>The "American voter as a whole" did not become stupid all of a sudden in the last election. The difference is that voting for someone like Trump is WAY WAY WAY WAAAAAYYY more stupid than voting for the likes of Obama. It's not a matter of the level of stupidity - it's the level of how stupid the choices were. Voting for someone like Trump is going to result in a lot more consequences than voting for someone like Obama (or Hillary, or anyone else than ran that had a real chance in the last election). We're in the midst of a looming constitutional crisis because there were too many people that made a really stupid choice - and anyone with the slightest understanding of government and politics could easily see it coming. So people were either too stupid about politics or just too stupid to care. Either way -- it's stupidity - and a lot of it.
So they didn't become more stupid at the last election- they just suddenly voted WAY WAY WAY more stupidly? Whereas somebody who voted for HRC or any of the unsuccessful candidates, wasn't as stupid? And the proof is that you're in the midst of a looming (which seems a contradiction of terms, but whatever) constitutional crisis- which is what exactly apart from an ominous label? My understanding is that there's a massive swirl of allegations by anonymous cowards, but only a WAY WAY WAY stupid dummy thinks that represents a constitutional crisis and you've already told us that voting for HRC proves you're not one of those dummies. So where's your proof?
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1