>So they didn't become more stupid at the last election- they just suddenly voted WAY WAY WAY more stupidly? Whereas somebody who voted for HRC or any of the unsuccessful candidates, wasn't as stupid? And the proof is that you're in the midst of a looming (which seems a contradiction of terms, but whatever) constitutional crisis- which is what exactly apart from an ominous label? My understanding is that there's a massive swirl of allegations by anonymous cowards, but only a WAY WAY WAY stupid dummy thinks that represents a constitutional crisis and you've already told us that voting for HRC proves you're not one of those dummies. So where's your proof?

The stupid guys are the dems in this case. I sort of remember that the Gop was in shambles two years ago, more or less without a viable candidate and with a rich assortment of nutcases in its upper echelons, without a real strategy (unless you count the list of red buttons to push for hot discussions on not really substantial but very divisive issues). They just had to come up with something resembling a strategy, a few hot soundbites and the elections were their to take.

Instead they shunned the exactly winning strategy they had (Bernie), and went an extra mile to rig their own primaries and make sure their good connections with Wallstreet were intact, that the banksters' reign remains untouched, that more jobs get outsourced, and that the 1% increase their distance from the people. They did exactly everything that was required to keep the status quo, just turn it to eleven. Promised no change except where it will enrich the rich a bit more.

So at a time when both parties were cemented in their lunacies there comes this clockwork orange and changes the game. They should have seen this coming but chose not to.