>>>Its not about one incident with one reporter John.
>
>In real life the furor IS about his exclusion presented by you as destruction of the 1st amendment. Surely you accept that the 1st amendment doesn't allow reporters to shout "fire!" in a theater- iow it's not a free pass to behave however you like?

It is ok to yell "fire!" in a theater when there is actually a fire in the theater.

>>>Perhaps since you do not live here and are not a citizen of the USA the severity of the situation escapes you. And since you appear to have some facts incorrect I think I will pass on discussing it further with you.
>
>Perhaps the scientific concept of questioning a hypothesis escapes you. And when adults discuss, they present undoctored facts rather than paraphrases or vague references as a disguised ad hominam slap.

If you're delusional of the actual facts there is no way to frame a proper discussion I've decided not to bother as it would just be a waste of my time.