>>>I understand that there are definitions of words in the dictionary -- but that is only 1/2 of the picture. You need to put in context - and you're failing to do so.
>
>I'm questioning your context that Trump must by lying when he says he is using a dictionary definition rather than a smeary version you insist he meant.
>
>>> For example you're confusing the word 'nationalism' with the 1930's use of the word - and thus the word 'invasion' takes on a whole new meaning - especially considering if you take into account who said it and when it was said - -and of course where he's been saying it.
>
>That makes no sort of sense: that nationalistic governments did bad things in the 1930s doesn't change the definition of the word "nationalist" or chain any further use of the word to the atrocities.

Today in the USA Nationalism is tied to "White Nationalist" - if you do not know what that is here then look it up.

>Next you'll insist that because you once saw a person with dark skin stealing, all people with dark skins must be thieves.

uhh no -- however since Trump is a racist, he might lol.

>>>So either you've misunderstood all of this (and seeing how you are not from here I suppose I can understand that) - or you're just making excuses to justify racist behavior -- which I doubt.
>
>You don't need to be a carpenter to see whether a table has wobbly legs. And boy, does your argument have wobbly legs.

It is not an argument - it's me explaining and putting in context - who, what, where, when etc so you know what it means to us Americans vs a guy looking up words in the dictionary to understand it. Sadly doing that in general with Trump is difficult as he is an idiot with a very limited vocabulary and limited reading skills.