>>>Heck even today there were more serious revelations regarding his campaign manager Paul Manafort, and you can bet your bottom dollar that more revelations, indictments, convictions, guilty pleas, etc will follow.
>
>Yes but what precisely is the crime for which you believe Trump should be impeached, or is the idea to keep investigating until you can get something on him?

As I explained to you before -- there does not need to be a crime for him to be impeached. And the investigation should continue until Muller says he's finished.

>Meanwhile, my understanding is that the NYT bombshell turns out to be a dud, since the purported Russians close to the Kremlin he is accused of providing with polling data were in fact Ukranians. From NYT: A previous version of this article misidentified the people to whom Paul Manafort wanted a Russian associate to send polling data. Mr. Manafort wanted the data sent to two Ukrainian oligarchs, Serhiy Lyovochkin and Rinat Akhmetov, not Oleg V. Deripaska, a Russian oligarch close to the Kremlin.

You seem to of missed the point lol. Those are not Americans are they?

>IMHO your continuing reliance on this fake news illustrates one of the dangers of fake news: it's never corrected with the alacrity with which the accusation is initially made, creating a rolling thunder that something bad is afoot apart from the prejudice of the fake news itself.

Typical -- don't like the news so call it fake. Something you've fallen for as it's being normalized by Trump. You reliance on believing a pathological liar before anyone else is disturbing at best.