>>>There are a large number of legal arguments that support what I'm saying as well -- and if it were to ever came down to it,,..it would end up in court to figure it out. At this point, since there has been no arrest or indictment and no one seems real interested in either (except maybe Trump lol) then my legal argument has to stand - at least for the moment.
>
>It's not an argument, it's a request for explanations to support argument.
>
>You can see I've gone to source including FBI policy and US statute.

...right. Now go research many (aka most) legal experts say that those do not apply.

>Perhaps Mueller in his report will reveal that he did in fact investigate other forms of Russian Collusion and satisfied himself that there is no beef there either. But Mueller is not the only one who can discipline Comey and worth remembering FBI and DOJ Directorship has been in flux.

>My pick re Mueller: he has had his trials and tribulations but this investigation is the one for which he will be remembered. He will have crossed every t and dotted every i and ensured there's no loose ends for anybody dissatisfied with the result to pull on forever.
>
>Meanwhile Adam Schiff has now overtly stated that he won't be satisfied with the Mueller investigation results and intends to investigate forever. Have to tell you, the optics are awful and if an ambitious non-swamper were to form a new sort of party focused on people rather than jousting the opponent, your binary system might receive the shake-up it needs.

Adam Schiff has not said that he intents to investigate 'forever'. Adam Schiff is investigating because the republicans refused to hear from witnesses or examine evidence.

What I find odd here is that you seem to be more interested in attacking investigators without justification than the fact that our president is unfit and a criminal. You could always start a great career at FoxNews lol