>>..right. Now go research many (aka most) legal experts say that those do not apply.

Citation? I'd be surprised- FBI policy is FBI policy. All I've seen is smudgy-wudgy pretending that "not classified" means "perfectly legal" or that FBI employees can write their meeting notes in a cunning fashion that converts them into personal rather than government property.

>>Adam Schiff has not said that he intents to investigate 'forever'. Adam Schiff is investigating because the republicans refused to hear from witnesses or examine evidence.

What Republicans would they be? Mueller?

Here's what Schiff said exactly: his investigation would "allow us to investigate any credible allegation that financial interests or other interests are driving decision-making of the President or anyone in the administration. That pertains to any credible allegations of leverage by the Russians or the Saudis or anyone else... whether any foreign actor has sought to compromise or holds leverage, financial or otherwise, over Donald Trump, his family, his business, or his associates."

IOW a fishing expedition that does not follow Western legal norms in requiring grounds first: just pick a topic you participated (colluded with foreigners) in trumping up then investigate and investigate in case you can find "any" credible allegation that financial or other interests drive your opponent.

Beria would approve. It's almost tragic that Trump Derangement Syndrome doesn't let you see how improper this is, and how these awful precedents often are regretted when they are applied in reverse.