Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
A Great Day in America
Message
From
27/03/2019 06:00:37
 
 
To
26/03/2019 10:41:52
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
News
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01667563
Message ID:
01667582
Views:
45
>>Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court
>>Stormy Daniels has to pay Trump $393,000
>>Michael Avenatti has been arrested for bank fraud, wire fraud and embezzlement in CA and bank fraud, wire fraud and extortion in NY
>>
>> Special counsel Robert Mueller's report found no evidence that US President Donald Trump's campaign team "conspired or coordinated" with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election.
>>
>>Another Great Day in America!
>
>It's only a good day if we learn something from it.
>The failures of the press in this case approach those of the WMD mess in 2003.
>Nobody died with this mess, but some of the same people are involved.
>
>It's a huge blunder.
>The problem is that this stuff works.
>
>The recent turnover in the house might have been attributable in part to all these lies propagated by the press.
>The equally fallacious reporting about HRC's mail server (no indictments) might have cost her the election.

I agree that the media more interested in consumer attention than informing consumers is a very large part of the problem.
But the rules forbidding US citizens to talk to foreign ministers when trying to get elected seem to me antiquated/unbalanced, if my interpretation (built mainly from the press again, IANAL) is correct.

Some of the things like Flynn saying things untrue about such meetings to the FBI I consider to be (newsworthy) personal stupidity.

IIRC Stormy had to reimburse Trump lawyer cost, as claim was frivolous. Over here looser has to pay winners lawyer cost (or the percentage of the claim won/lost) which IMO has more benefits than drawbacks than the US way of handling such cost. If Trump lawyer cost were split between Stormy AND HER attorney (perhaps after letting some air out of the bill) it might have been better to stop frivolous lawsuits.

On Kavanaugh judicial quality I have no opinion - he did not make a good impresson testifying, but bringing up such matters after umpty years should not matter IMO.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform