>>Point I was to make;
>>How come VFP still being part of M$dn distribution is considered such 'risk' and is on a no-go list for corporations.
>>It is M$ product after all, why it has been treated as syphilis ? Who advised them to do so ?
>>VB is somehow ok but VFP no ?
>
>М$ may change, but its policies are forever. And spreading. VFP was an adopted child; VB the less gifted but heir apparent. Guess to whose prom night would Bidža* go?

Mostly agreeing (~80%), but vfp devs arguing for remote dbf as datastore for anything in this century also did vfp a disservice IMO.
Whenever the problems inherent to that approach surfaced, vfp and not the bad practice was blamed...