>>>>>>>Nope. That's not clarity of vision.
>>>>>>>It's insight.
>>>>>>>Don't agree?
>>>>>>>That's OK.
>>>>>>>You have your insights, I have mine.
>>>>>
>>>>>People have "insights" about all sorts of things. Climate change. "Some neonazis are good people". Russia, Russia, Russia. Pee pee. He's Kenyan.
>>>>>
>>>>>Connection to the real world?
>>>>>
>>>>>Optional IME.
>>>>>
>>>>>I prefer to play scientist. It means questioning things and not just chanting "four legs good" or cleaving to easy/popular answers, but I can't help it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Dehumanizing?
>>>>>>>Didn't mean it that way and if that's the inference people will take, I shouldn't have said it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Calling somebody "trash" isn't meant to be dehumanizing? i guess that's another "insight" whose purity exempts it from examination.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>He's lowered the standing of the POTUS to a new depth and as I said when I started this thread, I regret my vote for him. He's not the kind of person I want representing me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ditto
>>>
>>>Will you still vote for the democrat - even Biden?
>>
>>Yes.
>>I'll everything I can to help other candidates beat Joe, but Trump has to go.
>>He's already left a smear on the history of this country.
>>It has to stop.
>OK, I give up . What's the smear?

Your asking that question indicates that we can't possibly have an intelligent discourse on that subject, since in my view, the answer is self-evident to anyone who can speak or read English.

No problem.

Let's not berate each other.