>>>>>>>>Nope. That's not clarity of vision.
>>>>>>>>It's insight.
>>>>>>>>Don't agree?
>>>>>>>>That's OK.
>>>>>>>>You have your insights, I have mine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>People have "insights" about all sorts of things. Climate change. "Some neonazis are good people". Russia, Russia, Russia. Pee pee. He's Kenyan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Connection to the real world?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Optional IME.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I prefer to play scientist. It means questioning things and not just chanting "four legs good" or cleaving to easy/popular answers, but I can't help it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Dehumanizing?
>>>>>>>>Didn't mean it that way and if that's the inference people will take, I shouldn't have said it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Calling somebody "trash" isn't meant to be dehumanizing? i guess that's another "insight" whose purity exempts it from examination.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>He's lowered the standing of the POTUS to a new depth and as I said when I started this thread, I regret my vote for him. He's not the kind of person I want representing me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Ditto
>>>>
>>>>Will you still vote for the democrat - even Biden?
>>>
>>>Yes.
>>>I'll everything I can to help other candidates beat Joe, but Trump has to go.
>>>He's already left a smear on the history of this country.
>>>It has to stop.
>>OK, I give up . What's the smear?
>


>Your asking that question indicates that we can't possibly have an intelligent discourse on that subject

So far so good - but then you have to add a little berating of your own.

, since in my view, the answer is self-evident to anyone who can speak or read English.
>
>No problem.
>
>Let's not berate each other.