>>Apparently they do not censor but give users the tools to censor as they please. That is in keeping with the principle of free speech. If you truly believe in free speech then you must defend the right to the speech of those you despise. I find this a worthy principle. But give me the tools to filter-out that which I dislike and filter-in that which I like. But do not filter for me like Twitter and Facebook do. I do not need a middle man telling me what to think.
>>
>>If the founders or staff of Parler.com have taken some racist positions then let’s hear about that but I have no knowledge of that.
>
>Anyone who does not censor Nazis and lies, attract them willingly. Anyone who let a Nazi a say is a supporter. Anyone who explicitly says no censorship is wooing those censored for good reasons on other places. IOW he supports them. It is not wrong to assume that non Nazi person will not do this. Because freedom has limits, and Nazis are out of bound.

Disagree on first sentence, although it might be on purpose - think honeypot ;-)

On second sentence, strong disagree. Ridiculing them is much better if done without misrepresenting their words, as is true of other options of own behaviour.

On the rest: if you censor such messages, you drive them underground or out of public eye. This will result in weakening thinking and rhetoric muscles of those now "guarded" from thoughts, arguments and other utterings of such people,. Not a good idea in my book, esp. as then more control will be asked for (and needed) by typically hidden state institutions from NSA over Verfassungsschutz up to Schlapphüten. Not a scenario I prefer...

regards from a Neanderthal (even if blue-eyed...)